Promoting Science and Technology for Socio-Economic Development
Most of us share the view that science and technology play a crucial role in today’s society and has become one of the most essential tools for the development of any country. Science and technology play a crucial role in wealth creation and economic development and has become the primary engine of economic growth that provides the key to unlocking any country’s potential.
Advances in science and technology are shrinking physical distances and bringing people from different parts of the world to collaborate in a seamless manner wherever and whenever they are. They are crucial to enhancing access to knowledge, which has become an increasingly essential commodity in today’s world.
Humanity faces numerous challenges such as climate change, food security, poverty, and threats by various pandemics. We cannot address any of the global challenges without an investment in science and technology.
The 1979 Noble Laureate in physics, Abdus Salam observes, “in the final analysis it is basically mastery and utilisation of modern science and technology that distinguishes the South from the North.”
Back in the good old days when we were in school, we read about the Industrial Revolution and how it dramatically changed every aspect of human life and lifestyles. This is when machinery began to replace manual labor. Its impact spread throughout Europe and North America. We learnt about how the United Kingdom and France benefited tremendously from the industrial revolution in the 19th century. Science and technology played a crucial role in the realization of the objectives of the revolution.
We also learnt about how the United States emerged from an agrarian economy into an industrial superpower in the 20th century. We learnt about how Taiwan and Korea became industrialized countries through science and technology.
We learnt how the Green revolution led to significant increases in agricultural production between the 1940s and 1970s. This revolution led to sustained food surpluses and eliminated the threat of starvation, especially in Asia. It raised farmers’ incomes and contributed to the decline in poverty. It made it possible for people to have access to better nutrition and a more balanced diet. For those living in rural areas, it created greater employment opportunities. The agricultural revolution came about due to significant advances in science and technology.
Today, we are learning about how China and India are transforming their economies through science and technology, through biotechnology, nanotechnology, and developments in microelectronics.
The developed countries of North America, Europe, Scandinavia, and the Far East have made tremendous progress in advancing science and technology, compared to other parts of the world. They’ve put man on the moon, developed a space station, invented robots, hypersonic transportation, advanced artificial intelligence, new medical technology that is prolonging longivity, developed hydrogen powered vehicles, launched satellites, developed DNA fingerprinting, and lot more.
Unfortunately, the story in our part of the world is different. Fact is, we cannot advance as a nation or continent without the infusion of modern science and technology.
The question I ask is, how do we transform Ghana and the rest of Africa, socially and economically through science and technology. How can a country, blessed with education, with mineral wealth, with natural forest, with power and influence, use what we have been given to enrich a society that has been too long poor, too long hungry, too long ill?
And the answers we give must recognize the role that Science plays in finding solutions to the problems that plague Ghana and the rest of Africa.
Science has found the cause of the malaria that has plagued Africa for centuries, and there are the nets that can prevent this illness, and medicine that relieve its impact. How do we move this knowledge and these pills to those who need them?
Agricultural science has developed simple and low or no cost techniques for increasing the output of small farms. How do we get this knowledge and techniques to the millions of small-scale farmers who need them.
Through science and technology, we now know that millions of Africans sicken their households by burning kerosene for light and cooking. And there are alternatives that use the light of the sun for light and cooking. How do we move this knowledge and these tools to the those who need them. Science, then, has found solutions to many of the ills and evils that continue to haunt Africa. And the big question is, how can we bring these solutions to those millions of Africans who cannot read or write.
Fact is, we should learn from how and where the developed world started and the challenges they’ve encountered in reaching where they are today. But, we in the developing world should NOT wholly follow their research models that has led to where they are today. Instead, we should adapt and develop technologies appropriate to our local circumstances, and help build on what we have.
Some call this the “latecomer strategy.” This is the identification of strategic opportunities and technologies that are relevant to a country and urgent efforts made to secure access to them.
For example, Brazil has done it by using ethanol produced from sugarcane-a traditional crop in the country- as fuel to replace gasoline. By so doing,the government of Brazil was able to replace half of the gasoline used by automobiles in the country (over 200,000 barrels of ethanol per day) with a renewable energy source. In so doing, Brazil became a pioneer in an area that had been neglected by industrialized countries.
South Korea along with many of the Asian countries have steadily invested in science, technology, engineering, mathematics and statistics (STEMS) and the result is clear. We need leadership to tap into local talents to help Ghana and Africa leapfrog the early transitional difficulties.
Nana Prof. Osei Darkwa, President
African Virtual Campus
![IT must be one of the most difficult – and exasperating – tasks in the world to be the President of a nation like Ghana. For you may travel all over4 the world, talking to the leaders of “the developed nations”, to try persuade them that the pandemic that is afflicting the world, Covid-19 (with its variants) is a truly global destroyer and thatnowhere is safe from it, until everywhere is safe. You may deploy your most eloquent language to point out that although, the scientists of the “developed countries” have managed to manufacture a vaccine that has been seen to work against the pandemic, the politicians of the “developed countries” are, contrary to undertakings they have made to the World Health Organisation (WHO) hoarding the vaccine in their countries. Reports suggest that whereas the governments of the “developed countries” are targeting 100 percent of their populace for vaccination, and getting closer to their objective every day, less than 10% of the populace of the developing countries have so far been vaccinated, as a result of a lack of vaccines. Is this fair? you ask. Air travel (you continue) has made international contacts extremely easy. And since the Covid-19 virus and its latest variant (Omicron) in particOman Ghana versus Covid-19 08 www.ghanaiantimes.com.gh GHANAIAN Times Features TUESDAY, DECEMBER 21, 2021ular, are very transmissible. So it is in everyone's educated self-interest to see that all people on the planet are fully vaccinated. As a result of your Government's efforts, you hear that plenty of vaccines have arrived in your country and you are emboldened to announce that your Government will soon be able to vaccinate its entire adult population. Then, you get the shock of your life: an intelligence report tells you that some mischievous people are spreading the fake news that if a person allows himself or herself to be vaccinated, the “vaccine will make that person vote for your governing NPP whether he/she wants to do so or not!” WHAAAAT! How does one counter such fake news? If the Government say it is not true, the conspiracy theorists shoot back, “And are you so naïve as to expect them to admit that the vaccine will make you vote for the NPP?” Wow! Are people so wicked that despite the gains that the world has already made through vaccination (such as the elimination of small pox from the world and the near-extinction of polio and yellow fever) they try to dissuade others from taking advantage of anti-Covid vaccination? Especially since people who are clever enough to invent such fake news must know of the horrible pain that Covid-19 subjects people to, before it finally kills them? What makes the anti-Covid vaccination story doubly awful is that its seeds are sown on pre-fertilised ground. In the past, some wicked scientists in the developed countries have allowed themselves to be used by their [usually racist] governments to administer harmful vaccines and other medications to people, using the lie that such interventions can save them from certain disease. One of the most devastating such deceptions occurred in the United States in 1932. Below is the horrible story as told on the OFFICIAL website of the US CENTRES FOR DISEASE CONTROL [CDC]: https://www.cdc.gov/tuskegee/timeline.htm QUOTE: THE U.S. PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE SYPHILIS STUDY AT TUSKEGEE In 1932, the USPHS, [US Public Health Service] working with the Tuskegee Institute, began a study to record the natural history of syphillis. It was originally called the “Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphillis in the Negro Male” (sic) [now referred to as the “USPHS Syphilis Study at Tuskegee”]. The study initially involved 600 Black men — 399 with syphillis, 201 who did not have the disease. Participants’ informed consent was not collected. Researchers told the men they were being treated for “bad blood,” a local term used to describe several ailments, including syphillis, anaemia, and fatigue. In exchange for taking part in the study, the men received free medical exams, free meals, and burial insurance (sic)! By 1943, penicillin was the treatment of choice for syphilis and becoming widely available, but the participants in the study were not offered treatment. In 1972, an Associated Press story about the study was published. As a result, the Assistant Secretary for Health and Scientific Affairs appointed an Ad Hoc Advisory Panel to review the study. The advisory panel concluded that the study was “ethically unjustified”; that is, the “results [were] disproportionately meagre, compared with known risks to [the] human subjects involved.” In March 1973, the panel advised the Secretary of the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare to instruct the USPHS to provide all necessary medical care for the survivors of the study. The Tuskegee Health Benefit Programme was established to provide these services and in 1975, participants’ wives, widows and children were added to the program. In 1995, the program was expanded to include health, as well as medical, benefits. The last study participant died in January 2004. The last widow receiving THBP benefits died in January 2009. ... I973, a class-action lawsuit was filed on behalf of the study participants and their families, resulting in a $10 million, out-of-court settlement in 1974. On May 16, 1997, President Bill Clinton issued a formal Presidential Apology [over the study.] UNQUOTE In Ghana, the fake news that the anti-Covid vaccine would make people “vote for the NPP” has already begun to cause disagreements in some households. A family known to me has had to dismiss its house-help because she obstinately refused to take the jab. To illustrate the way the way the political message contained in the fake news has been camouflaged, I offer a version of the last conversation between the head of the household and the house-help: BOSS: Hey, “A”, you are very lucky! Instead of you going around to look for the vaccinators, they are coming to our estate! HOUSE-HELP: They are coming here? B: Yes! H: But Boss, I told you that my brother took the jab and had to be admitted into hospital. B: It doesn't mean that you too will become ill if you get the jab. It affects different people in different ways. Look, as you know, I have had all my own jabs and I have never been ill – as you know! H: But Boss, if you have taken all your jabs, then you are PROTECTED, are you not? B: Yes, I am. H: In that case, even if I become infected because I have not taken the jab, I cannot transmit the disease to you and YOU will be all right? B: I can't say that! Because, as I have explained to you, the pandemic can affect different people in different ways. H: Then the jab is useless? B: Listen, I can't take any risks with such a dangerous disease. Either you take it or you leave, I am sorry. I cannot allow you to expose me and my family to the risk of catching Covid. As I reported earlier, the House-help chose to leave. Both her Boss and I are convinced that it wasn't mere logicthat made her decide not to take the jab. She was probably under the influence of a church/cult. Or political propaganda! • Omicron cases at Kotoka International Airport are amongst the unvaccinated](https://ghanaiantimes.com.gh/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/GT-8.pdf-Adobe-Acrobat-Pro-DC-4-220x150.jpg)


