A research scientist at the School of Nuclear and Allied Sciences, Atomic Energy, Ghana, Dr Samuel Bamford, yesterday told the High Court in Accra that one of the reports relied upon by the state to prosecute Dr Stephen Kwabena Opuni and one other, in ongoing COCOBOD trial has no basis in science.
It is recalled that the Ghana Standards Authority conducted scientific tests on lithovit fertiliser, the basis upon which the state is prosecuting Dr Opuni, the former Chief Executive of Ghana COCOBOD, and Mr Seidu Agongo, the Managing Director of Agricult Ghana Limited, a fertiliser-manufacturing company.
However, the report Dr Bamford is discrediting is the Quartey Papafio Report on lithovit fertiliser, which the prosecution is relying to make a case against the accused.
For instance, the research scientist, who is giving evidence as
a defence witness, said the Papafio Report used the basis for testing water to test the fertiliser.
Below is what transpired between the witness and counsel for Mr Agongo and Agricult Ghana Limited, Mr Benson Nutsupkui.
Nutsupkui: My lord, the new witness is Dr Samuel Akoto Bamford. He is a principal research scientist with the School of Nuclear and Allied Sciences, Atomic Energy Ghana.
Nutsupkui: We requested that you analyse two scientific reports on the testing of lithovit fertiliser by Ghana standards Authority.
Witness: Yes, my lord.
Nutsupkui: You have the reports of your analysis?
Witness: Yes, my lord, I have the reports.
Nutsupkui: Please kindly look at this document. Is that the reports you produced?
Witness: Yes, my lord.
Nutsupkui: Now, look at exhibit H, page 105. That is scientific report in exhibit H. Have you seen it before?
Witness: Yes, it is one of the reports I analysed.
Nutsupkui: How did you identify the Papafio report you analysed?
Witness: I attached it as Appendix 1
Question: Exhibit 144 is the Ghana standards Authority test results.
Nutsupkui: How did you identify it in your report?
Witness: I identified it as Appendix 2.
Nutsupkui: Do you have a copy of your report?
Witness: Yes, my lord.
Nutsupkui: My lord, we would like to tender the report through the witness.
Prosecution: My lord, we don’t have any objection.
Justice Aboagye Tandoh: By court, the scientific evaluation of laboratory analysis report on fertiliser sample as analysed by Dr Bamford is tendered without objection, and it is admitted as exhibit 149.
Nutsupkui: Sir, with regard to the Quartey Papafio Report, your first issue was with the reference. What is your issue?
Witness: The reference in the Quartey Papafio Report is the standard reference for drinking water.
Nutsupkui: Sir, so what is good or bad about that reference?
Witness: My lord, water and fertiliser have different nature and metrics. In other words, water and fertiliser are not the same, so you cannot use the same procedure of testing without serious modification.
Nutsupkui: So, in your analysis, what standard did the Quartey Papafio Report use?
Witness: The Quartey Papafio Report cited GS 175, which is in 2017, and it is for drinking water.
Nutsupkui: What analytical technique was used by the Quartey Papafio Report?
Witness: The analytical technique was unclear and ambiguous.
Nutsupkui: Now, Sir, you also analysed the results of the Quartey Papafio Report. What did you find?
Witness: The Quartey Papafio Report presented only three perimeters – calcium, magnesium and urea. These are not enough for any fertiliser.
Nutsupkui: You also analysed the perimetres he used. What did you find?
Witness: The few perimetres he used were not in accordance with the standards
Nutsupkui: Sir, what is the conclusion of the Quartey Papafio Result?
Witness: Their report was contradictory to their own results.
Nutsupkui: So, if we are to determine whether a product is a fertiliser or not, can we be held on the Quartey Papafio Report? In other words, can the Quartey Papafio Report be relied upon?
Witness: No, my lord, the report is wrong.
Nutsupkui: Now, let us come to the material safety report. What is the issue with the reference and testing method?
Witness: My lord, the reference and testing method in this report are acceptable because they comply with the Ghana analytical manual.
BY MALIK SULLEMANA