Safo–Kantanka acquitted, discharged in bribery case
The High Court in Kumasi yesterday acquitted and discharged Alexander Kwabena Sarfo-Kantanka, the New Patriotic Party’s Constituency Chairman for Juaben in the Ashanti Region, in a bribery case linked to his confirmation as Municipal Chief Executive (MCE) nominee.
The case, which became a focal point in Ghana’s anti-corruption efforts, stemmed from accusations that Sarfo-Kantanka attempted to induce assembly members with financial incentives to secure their endorsement after his nomination by then-President Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo.
However, after a prolonged trial, the court found insufficient evidence to sustain the charges, effectively clearing him of all off wrongdoing.
Sarfo-Kantanka’s legal troubles began in 2021 when a viral video surfaced, allegedly showing him demanding a refund of monies he had purportedly distributed among assembly members to facilitate his confirmation.
Following his rejection for the position for a second time, the footage of him confronting some assembly members intensified public speculation and prompted swift action from the Office of the Special Prosecutor (OSP).
Determined to assert its mandate in tackling corruption, the OSP launched a comprehensive investigation into the matter. The fallout led to Sarfo-Kantanka facing 26 counts of corruption related to alleged bribery attempts within the Juaben Municipal Assembly.
His trial was widely perceived as a litmus test for Ghana’s anti-corruption framework, given the Special Prosecutor’s increasing role in tackling financial impropriety in public office.
The High Court commenced the full trial on October 20, 2022, marking the beginning of an extensive judicial process that brought Sarfo-Kantanka’s alleged dealings under intense scrutiny.
While the court upheld 23 counts, it directed his legal team to present a defense against the remaining three counts, setting the stage for what many believed would be a defining moment in his career.
The prosecution, led by the OSP, presented three assembly members as key witnesses, hoping their testimonies would corroborate the accusations levelled against Sarfo-Kantanka.
Yet, in a stunning twist, each of the witnesses denied receiving any money or financial inducement from the accused, significantly weakening the prosecution’s case.
Moreover, Sarfo-Kantanka consistently pleaded not guilty throughout the trial, maintaining that no bribery had occurred. Amid the legal battle, he was granted GH¢90,000 bail, allowing him temporary freedom while the case progressed.
However, complications arose when the presiding judge overseeing the trial was transferred to another jurisdiction. Despite this, she filed a case completion plan to ensure that the matter reached its legal conclusion.
During the final ruling, Justice Priscilla Dikro Ofori noted that despite the viral video allegedly showing Sarfo-Kantanka demanding a refund, there was no concrete evidence linking this request to actual bribery or inducements.
With key witnesses refuting claims of receiving money and inconsistencies in the prosecution’s evidence, the court determined that the case did not meet the threshold required for conviction. Consequently, Sarfo-Kantanka was acquitted and discharged, bringing the legal battle to an end.
For Sarfo-Kantanka and his legal team, the ruling is viewed as a major victory and a restoration of his public image.
Kwame Adom Appiah, counsel for the accused, later remarked that his client endured a traumatic experience throughout the trial, expressing relief that the court had ruled in his favour.
